People believe that museums visitors should be imposed by entry ticket although some destination places are free-charge. I think that the benefit outweigh the drawback with reasons described below.
The negative side of this policy is people’s attraction to visit museum will possibly decline gradually. This is because, currently, museums are being one of affordable destination places for tourists, especially, local tourists. Regulating this policy will make people tend to choose other places to spend their sedentary time, such as zoos and parks. This evidence has been occurred in Jakarta, capital city of Indonesia, that people tend to go to other amusement laces like Ragunan zoos or Ancol beach rather than go to Fatahillah museum due to entry price factor that is cheaper. This occurrence lead to many experts worry that the young generation will possibly have low knowledge about history of their cities since the number of museum tourists below the expectation.
Although it has negative impact, this regulation lead to more positive impact. One of the advantages is the facilities improvement of the museums after imposing this policy. It is clear that one of problem si currently being faced by museums are the availability of supporting and modern facilities. Imposing this regulation will make museums officer provide facilities that improve people satisfactory to visit it. For instance, many museums in developing countries provide low information about their collections like the origin of the collection or the way to make it. The revenue from entry ticket can make museums officer provide it by providing facilities like visual images like visual images to gain more people visiting the museums.
In short, although it might seems sensible that regulating entry ticket prices in museums has drawback, I believe it has more benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'facilities'' or 'facility's'?
Suggestion: facilities'; facility's
...ve impact. One of the advantages is the facilities improvement of the museums after imposi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, for instance, i think, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42611683849 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70065490593 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54295532646 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0082122189 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.785714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168948491165 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640198226965 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277562450194 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101101188879 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034675631511 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.