Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Museums are highly considered as intriguing and important destinations for citizens who want to explore a country or area. However, there are arguments between the benefits and drawbacks of the museum’s admission fee. In my opinion, I do believe that the advantages take over the disadvantageous ones because of several particular reasons.
On the one hand, museums which apply entrance charge will have economic benefits. Firstly, the income from the fee contributes greatly to the budget spent on maintenance. In order to provide visitors with the best experience, items exhibited must be in good condition; therefore, they are frequently checked, cleaned and repaired. Consequently, the process required numerous bucks which the regular money from the government is not enough. Secondly, museums which are specialized in art need a great amount of money to buy and organize art exhibitions. Without the admission fee, they cannot be able to maintain the work and provide visitors with sought after masterpieces. For example, most museums in Singapore have a quite expensive entrance fee, however, visitors are satisfied with the service and the number of things and knowledge they obtain from the museums.
On the other hand, charging an admission fee can cause several problems, especially in developing countries. The first disadvantage is that the number of visitors to museums will significantly decrease. In fact, most museum-goers are students; therefore, if they have to pay, they will lose their interest and go to other entertainment places instead. Moreover, a huge number of working people or people from rural areas are not able to pay a visit to museums since their budget is not enough for those luxurious activities. Another detrimental effect is that the charge will limit museums’ educational purposes. Extremely valuable historical lessons which are conducted inside museums will be overlooked due to the cost. Moreover, citizens are prone to the lack of opportunities to experience the priceless paintings or photos which are displayed occasionally in museums. As a result, both economic and social values will be severely influenced.
In conclusion, charging admission fees in museums can cause more bad effects than benefits. Therefore, governments should allocate a suitable amount of money for museums to run instead of enacting the entrance fee.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2026.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50543478261 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99801052496 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9935477156 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.3 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.95 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288579817745 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084688853493 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611477470824 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196748328166 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047934002423 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.