Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures should be taken to tackle this problem?
It is true that many ex-criminals tend to break the law again after their first punishment. While there are a variety of reasons of this trend, steps should be taken to cope with this phenomenon.
There are two fundamental motivations for those who used to punish commit a crime again. One possible reason could be because they have to encounter financial difficluties. After serving punishment in court, these ex-offenders with their criminal records seldom secure a job, either temporary or permanent, seeing that almost no managers long for employing those broke the law in a fear that they could become habitual criminals and adversely influence enterprises. Another trigger could be attributed to the lack of severe penalties in national legislation, which has facilitated many wrongdoers break the law constantly. Some robbers, for example, could be released after incurring a great deal of money in court without any tougher penalties such as imprisonment even though they stole invaluable commodites like gold bracelets.
In order to deal with this problem, measures should be implemented. Those criminals should be trained in prison or carry out work release program, which could help them to gain earning capacity after being discharged from jail or serving other punishments. By doing so, those ex-criminals could easily secure a job permanently to make ends meet and avoid committing more crimes in the long run. Governments, besides, also need to impose stringenter criminal laws such as longer period of imprisonment, which could act as a deterrent to crime. Ex-wrongdoers, therefore, would think twice before considering breaking the law again if they do not want to serve prison sentence.
In conclusion, there are the reasons why wrongdoers are inclinded to commit a crime again, which could be solved by the above-mentioned approaches
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 706, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed after incurring a great deal of money in court without any tougher penalties s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37671232877 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94417790293 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647260273973 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2433553061 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.769230769 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266170212641 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996110359835 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779140621999 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17876342223 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753752164243 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.