While historical buildings are preserved by the government under the law, some aggressive citizens think it is better to rebuild another one than maintain the original ones. In my opinion, keeping the historical site is the best way to remain ancestor's legacy; however, if the remaining are unable to fix, rebuild is an alternative choice.
Most of the old buildings are remained from previous generation for many years which can be historically meaningful to us in keeping the tradition. For example, Ximen red house theatre is an over 100-year-old theatre located in Taipei city. It serves crowds of people by providing arts, shows, and movies for decades. It’s too old and too dangerous to the people, so citizens in Taipei decide to pay a huge amount of money to keep it standing than tear it down.
In the other case, old Taiwanese aboriginal tribes in the deep mountain is considered to be less important for majority people in this land. Some people suggest knocking it down in trade of building a new houses for living people. But the whole area is now protected by law due to the historical causes to minority race. This is an example for history stand in the way of progress.
Maintain an ancient building could costs a lot of fortune but we can afford it, but if we abandon ancestor's legacy for being economic, we will lost more than just a building. Therefore, I believe keeping is better than replacement in terms of old buildings preservation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'house'?
Suggestion: house
...king it down in trade of building a new houses for living people. But the whole area i...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'cost'
Suggestion: cost
.... Maintain an ancient building could costs a lot of fortune but we can afford it, ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...tors legacy for being economic, we will lost more than just a building. Therefore, I...
^^^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...better than replacement in terms of old buildings preservation.
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'for example', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225 0.247107183377 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.182142857143 0.155533422707 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.107142857143 0.0946595960268 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0321428571429 0.0501214627716 64% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0464285714286 0.0437548338989 106% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132142857143 0.122226691241 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0535714285714 0.0403226058552 133% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.70131274057 2.80594681477 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0357142857143 0.0326793684256 109% => OK
Particles: 0.00714285714286 0.00163938923432 436% => OK
Determiners: 0.0964285714286 0.0861772015684 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0142857142857 0.021408717616 67% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00357142857143 0.011925033212 30% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1468.0 1933.35771543 76% => OK
No of words: 251.0 316.048096192 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84860557769 6.12580529183 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20517956788 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.362549800797 0.374742101984 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.278884462151 0.28420135186 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.199203187251 0.203846283523 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.127490039841 0.137316102897 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70131274057 2.80594681477 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.037074148 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609561752988 0.56093040696 109% => OK
Word variations: 64.3993940229 60.7387585426 106% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0891783567 75% => OK
Sentence length: 20.9166666667 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2902306206 49.517814964 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 127.492653851 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.814263465372 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.99599198397 100% => OK
Readability: 48.8051128818 49.1944974215 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.57534246575 1.69124875643 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321929859207 0.332605444948 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103795625235 0.102741220458 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0745276147977 0.0668466124924 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.576917980487 0.534860350844 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158349642181 0.148594505496 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137485093139 0.134430193775 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04992352478 0.0742795772207 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.277157111298 0.324371583561 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.106247841893 0.0638462369009 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200110730129 0.228012699653 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646713425226 0.058150111329 111% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.