Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nations history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones.
How important is it to maintain old buildings?
Should history stand in the way of progress?
It cannot be denied that a number of old buildings are protected by law to maintain its historical value, but some people believe that they should be demolished in order to build new ones. In this essay, I shall discuss the importance of maintaining old buildings and assess whether history hinders the process of structure development.
Quite a number of buildings are preserved by law mainly because it serve as a cultural or religious symbol to a country. One example is the Taal Church which is the biggest catholic church in Asia that is being maintained for years. Another reason is that they serve as story tellers. Old buildings like the Rizal Park illustrates historical events as it narrates the struggle of Dr. Jose Rizal under the Spanish colonization before he was shot in front of his countrymen. Lastly, ancestral buildings are well protected and promoted in order to attract tourists. One tourist destination that a lot of people visit is Vigan Ilocos Norte due to the fact that it showcases different ancestral houses that were built during the Spanish era, and it also mesmerizes many tourists because of its classical appearance.
Meanwhile, it is clear that history really affects the process of structure development due to its value and contribution to a country. As a result, historical buildings are maintained and remained unharmed for a long period of time.
As a conclusion, there are reasons why preserving and maintaining old buildings are important, and history plays a great factor in preventing structural improvement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'serves'?
Suggestion: serves
... are preserved by law mainly because it serve as a cultural or religious symbol to a ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...tained and remained unharmed for a long period of time. As a conclusion, there are reasons ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, really, so, well, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14173228346 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89292667347 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57874015748 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.459665734 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.727272727 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330482004112 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113262798995 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111295131643 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203464706184 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140682960367 0.056905535591 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.