Many people in the community now could buy consumer goods being cheaper. Whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years, there is a common phenomenon that the prices of products have been decreased thanks to the advent of modern technology. A point of debate is whether its advantages have overshadowed the disadvantages or. While there is a strong case for the former view, I am more inclined to the latter.
On the one hand, those in favour of cheaper goods may state their reasons as follows. Firstly, the fact that people are able to purchase less expensive items means that they can save a huge amount of money for other basic necessities. For example, they can devote more money to healthcare service or their children’s education. Furthermore, cheaper products will stimulate consumers desire to buy more. As a result, companies will earn more profits and expand, contributing to economic progress of a nation.
On the other hand, I would advocate with those who contend that making products cheaper will mislead customers to make a wrong decision on what they need to buy. Along with the capability of purchasing products at low-cost prices, buyers tend to make impulse shopping and thus, waste a great deal of money on useless items. This is often the case during sale seasons or in particularly, Tet holiday in Viet Nam. When suppermarkets are filled with loads of discounted goods which tempt shoppers to buy more beyond their needs. Another drawback would be that this newly-emerged trend will probaly impose an obstacle to manufacturers who make every effort to offer cheap prices even by cutting down on their yearly turnovers. Evenworse, if coroporations fail to meet the public’s demands, there might be a lack of consumer goods corrolating to inflation and other economic problems.
In conclusion, although it is undeniable that making products less expensive have tremendous influences on each individual embodied the society, I believe that this development should be taken into consideration as it might exert some detrimental effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'items'' or 'item's'?
Suggestion: items'; item's
...ple are able to purchase less expensive items means that they can save a huge amount ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...n save a huge amount of money for other basic necessities. For example, they can devote more mone...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... particularly, Tet holiday in Viet Nam. When suppermarkets are filled with loads of ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in particular, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20440251572 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89589861501 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625786163522 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4662174283 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149212302364 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048738971113 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546363604854 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755843568741 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299672163829 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.