Many people say that we now live in “consumer societies” where money and possessions are given too much importance. Others believe consumer culture has played a vital role in improving our lives.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is an ongoing trend of mass consumerism in terms of material properties and social status in the society, whilst consumer culture plays a fundamental part in enhancing living standard. From my point of view, I personally believe that this phenomenon has its detriment as well as advantage.
It is indispensable for employee, who would do their best by creativity and significant innovation. As a regard, the increase of income is a principle elements in order to satisfy the need of commodities, which also reduces poverty and acquires better quality of life. Likewise, people can deny the fact that consumerism is the main driving force of economic growth. In another word, the increasing demand of dwellers would result in the rising supply by manufactures and consequently, the worlds’ commerce will more and more flourish. So, it is inevitable to refuse the positives of consumer societies.
On the other hand, there is a rise in people following materialism to status symbols; therefore the moral quantities would be affected. For example, if an individual achieving everything with regard to money and possessions find it not enough, they are definitely greedy and selfish. Moreover, extra amount of waste is created due to the over consumption of products. Nowadays, people tend to buy goods ceaselessly that they throw them away after using it few time, which is not only a waste of money and it is also a cause of environmental problem.
To sum up, a consumer society has made the majority of people more materialistic, which may lead to them going astray in their lives, while aforementioned phenomenon is still the major reason that the economy boosts of every countries and its citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...hat they throw them away after using it few time, which is not only a waste of money and...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, likewise, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, as well as, to sum up, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12857142857 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98639773449 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639285714286 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6838681043 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.75 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14430012705 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416267151909 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314797568913 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786224768742 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232662242787 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.