Many people use their own cars rather public transport, so it is up to the government to encourage people to uses buses and trains instead. Do you agree or disagree?
The excessive use of private cars has been claimed to be the culprit of traffic congestion and air pollution in many major cities. Therefore, I strongly agree with the idea that the government should prompt their citizens to shift to public transportation in order to curb those problems.
Air degradation due to car's exhaust has raised public concern about healthy issue. Consequently, the reduction in the number of cars could cut down on emissions and thus yield a healthy lifestyle. It could also alleviate environmental problems as it is commonly believed that global warming partly stems from CO2 release. On top of that, the public transportation fares are completely affordable to every individual as these vehicles are funded by the government. As a result, the use of mass transit could save a lot of budgets as well as foster the economy of the entire community.
Another reason to opt for public transport is that traffic jam is mainly attributed to the rapid increase in the number of personal vehicles. If people choose to commute by buses or trains, it could greatly facilitate the government to tackle road congestions. However, some downsides still exist and should not be overlooked. As a matter of fact, the process of waiting for buses could be extremely time-consuming and frustrating. Still, everyone is on the threshold of faster and more reliable services from public transport with the constant advance in technology as a facilitator.
In conclusion, I would side with those who believe that traveling by mass transit should be widely accepted as its merits far outweigh the disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15909090909 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96253775262 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5184986232 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.769230769 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186873649173 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561369983284 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450395128127 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988965433797 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678895013391 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.