Many students have to study subjects which they do not like. Some people think this is a complete waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It has always been a high controversy issues over whether all subjects or specific subjects should be taught at school or even at university. While some people argue that following the latter approach would waste students’ time, many opponents concern this would make more disadvantage. I completely agree with these opponents and I will discuss at both side of the arguments in this essay.
It is an undeniable fact that every occupation have their main subjects, which peers have to study if they want to catch their dream jobs and enhance performance. However, some knowledges will be cooperated in curriculum in addition to increase comprehension effectively. For instance, material engineerings have to study biology, especially human organism, if they tend to invent an artificial organ which is used in human body. Moreover, it would be better if multitude drawbacks attacking patients’ health could be avoided. Secondly, an effort about teaching all subjects, particularly primary and secondary school, allows youngsters understand information from arias aspects before enroll in an expected course at the university.
On the other hand, sending time with unnecessary and unpleasant subjects would increase stress in children’s lives and lead them oppose studying at school. Furthermore workforce market demands workers who have multi-skilled and could be rotated in different positions later. If the new generation of student could not match this, they will face a serious problem as unemployment. Probably, the government might spend enormous compensation to support them in appropriate ways such as raising tax and transportation costs.
All things considered, there are strong arguments on both sides of this topic. Our offspring in the future should be prepared with based knowledge and further develop at some part which relates to their work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...nd lead them oppose studying at school. Furthermore workforce market demands workers who ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some part which relates to their work.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58041958042 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03423180856 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685314685315 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1796614688 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223465578262 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701524531693 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568843066189 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130934270224 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483535855392 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.