Many working people do not have enough free time off work to spend with their families and friends. Why? What are the effects on family life and society?
Nowadays, many people in the working class do not have much free time to spend with their family members and friends outside work. This essay will discuss the main reasons for this situation and describe the possible effects of this problem.
In my opinion, the major cause of this problem is the high pressure from their daily job. Today, most people are working from 9 to 5 and some of them are doing another part-time job in the weekend to afford their expenses. In the past, people were living in a big family with many members so that they could rely on each other in daily life. However, in modern society, people prefer to live alone or in a small family. This forces them to work mainly on their own to afford their living cost because it is mostly the only option. Moreover, due to the pressure from their works, they often come home late and feel exhausted. Instead of hanging out with their friends or their family members, they prefer to stay at home to recharge their energies after a long working day.
The possible effects of this problem on their family life and society are the increasing divorce rate and the declining labor force participation in the future. First of all, the lacking time with their families leads to an unhappy marriage. In many countries in European Union, many couples have decided to end their marriage because they can’t find a way to have enough quality time together. Secondly, more and more people insist to stay single or prefer not to have children. This will cause a greater effect on the labor force in the coming years. For example, in many Asian countries such as South Korea, Japan, and China, there are more old people than newborn babies, and these countries are facing a big problem that they will not have enough working force in years to come.
To sum up, spending too much time at work affects a lot of people nowadays. It’s mainly caused by high pressure and burnout from work and results in increasing divorce rate and loss of labor force in coming time.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63788300836 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12489727508 2.80592935109 76% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515320334262 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8689896057 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9411764706 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435368991872 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140285713364 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12595101556 0.0667982634062 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279195847916 0.151304729494 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077361683192 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.