Many young people regularly change their jobs over the years Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

Many young people regularly change their jobs over the years. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

The trend of job-hopping in youngsters becomes more common these days. Regardless of its own merits and demerits, this essay will explain why the benefits exceed the drawbacks.

First of all, job switching sometimes is considered by few as a treacherous act, for, in some cases, companies have already put a lot of trust in their employees. Therefore, leaving the job ought to spoil the relationship and the leavers are labelled as traitors; as a result many employees discourage to resign, avoiding that kind of stigma. In addition, the quitter would leave a resource gap within the enterprise which might disrupt the company’s operation. However, all of those arguments are thought to be irrelevant since the law legally permits the staff choosing the job whichever they want. What is more, not all job to job moving practices contain negative traits.

One of the positive things regarding job changing is the opportunity to earn more money on the new job. With the brought experience and skills from the past company, they (job-hopper) could bargain their salary, and sometimes getting much higher payment than before. Another advantage, the chance to learn new skills which potentially completes one’s trait. Because, most new places give different challenges, so naturally it will boost the worker’s ability, making them a more complete employee. Moreover, they will be easier to be noticed by their supervisor which eventually might lead to their fast promotion.

All in all, even though job changes are argued as unethical deeds, there is no such a definite rule which forces workers to stay in their current job forever. Furthermore, as the benefits of the condemned trait are seen to be life changing, in conclusion, it still gives more positive than negative impacts.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, first of all, in some cases, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20415224913 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71863559789 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660899653979 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9620220551 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.428571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9285714286 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148323480172 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502583713052 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446411716939 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846416148987 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312964880017 0.056905535591 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.