The map and chart below show the information for the global willingness to eat insect products and the current price for certain food available on the market place.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The map and the graph provides information on consumers’ willingness to consume insect products on a globally scale and the cost of food items available in the markets, in present times.
Overall, a major portion of the global population is willing to feed on insect products and the prices of these insect products are much higher as compared to the common food.
According to the map, Mexico has the highest rate with 71% whereas Japanese people showed the least eagerness with 21%. Other countries such as Peru and Thailand follow behind Mexico with 58% and 56%, respectively; meanwhile countries like USA, UK, India, Spain, Russia, Africa and Australia showed moderate interest ranging from 32% to 39%. China lies close to the center of the willingness scale with 44%.
Regarding the chart, the value of regular foods like meat (buffalo, beef, pork, chicken) and rice (glutinous rice and rice) are much cheaper than insect products. The most expensive insects, which are the weaver ant (wild) and bamboo caterpillar (wild) cost 10.65 and 10 USD/kg respectively. Meanwhile, rice, especially Thai Hom Mali, is the cheapest of all items with a price of 0.78 USD/kg.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('globally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('scale') instead of another adjective.
...llingness to consume insect products on a globally scale and the cost of food items available in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...f these insect products are much higher as compared to the common food. Accordi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 1.0 24.0651302605 4% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 1615.20841683 61% => OK
No of words: 192.0 315.596192385 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09375 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52468283899 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65625 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 506.74238477 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7277435042 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15059477605 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622735849015 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065232650222 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105190770956 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067549278147 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.