To meet the growing needs of food for the increasing population, country should make use of genetically engineered foods. However, some people believe that GM foods are not only unhealthy but affect the nature too. Do you agree or disagree about this?
Due to the increasing population density in today's world, demand for vital supplies such as food is becoming higher which raises concentration on enhanced genetic patterns crops to meet citizens needs. While some people agree that countries should produce these food, others believe that GM food is harmful not only for personal health but also the environment. Although there is an undeniable benefit of this trend, I wholeheartedly support the latter view.
People believe that to meet the growing need of food for the population, governments should allow irrigation of GM crops for an obvious reason. There is a common belief which has been proved that GM food is better than traditional one in some aspects. Because of genetic improvements, these new generations of crops grow and reproduce much easier and faster. They also have a stronger immune system and traits to be planted in severe conditions, for example, deserts or mountains.
In contrast, I believe the drawbacks which are associated with health and nature are worth concerning. Scientists have clarified the case claiming that GM food can cause genetic disorders, especially in babies. The reason for this is in order to create species to survive in disastrous conditions, chemical treatments have been applied to improve the genes of those plants and animals. The situation can be serious dus to the use of X-rays which make GM food contain a small amount of radiation. Moreover, despite the massive financial advantages, genetically fixed food can worsen the environmental problems today. Due to the positive points in business, mutative food which requires specific environments becomes the global phenomenon, consequently, thousands of forests and open spaces will be used for growing genetically modified plants which make the burden of air pollution and erosion heavier.
In conclusion, although GM food has the ability to meet the growing needs of increasing population density, I believe that there are numerous disadvantages on personal health and the environment to be considered. From my perspective, I suggest that national authorities should make decisions wisely to ensure adequate food supplies and natural conservation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...ple agree that countries should produce these food, others believe that GM food is harmful...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43023255814 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91858148791 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587209302326 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2947907253 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.533333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431510958352 0.244688304435 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137334428699 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966909920419 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275298378034 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433286927681 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.