In the model world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without face to face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development
It can not deny that the development of the internet has given many chances for human being in the world for example shop, work, communicate,... even live without face to face with others. This trend has both positive and negative.
There are several advantages that the internet offers users. Firstly, Internet help shop activities more conveniently due to the diversity of choice and cost-saving plans to customers. The same product show up but many stories sell, by a click, the user can buy a good suitable and quality without taking the effort to go to the place of sale. Secondly, The internet provides a wide range of jobs to youth. Before, people felt very difficult for looking for a job which just appear in the newspaper. Nowadays, the recruitment web is used with the aims in order to find human resources easily. Besides, working remotion become more and more popular between the countries, for instance, IT professionals in India work online for US-based company. Furthermore, The people can communicate indirectly via the means of media such as Facebook, Message, Instagram,...
However, this tendency has negative effects for many people. The social network is so attractive that they spend most time of the day for its. That can influence to work efficiency. Many young, are being narrowed by the virtual world of the internet, make their skill become worse and afraid to communicate. Online communicate so much can lead to loneliness and depression. The people who being addicted internet can affect seriously to healthy.
In conclusion, these days, the internet has changed the life dramatically. Besides the positive points that make people's life more improve, there are many disadvantages the internet give.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...orld for example shop, work, communicate,... even live without face to face with o...
^^
Line 2, column 856, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...dia such as Facebook, Message, Instagram,... However, this tendency has negative ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16370106762 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76628536071 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8257106379 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3684210526 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7894736842 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27417570496 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768000695078 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788749991923 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177027673162 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1135589623 0.056905535591 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.