It is undeniably true that materialistic lifestyle and technological advancements have been detrimental to human relations and of late parents have not been spending enough time with their descendants compared to ancestors. While few experts believe that these enhancements made life much easier than the past, the majority of them fear the affection between offspring and their parents. In my opinion, I agree that bonding among families is not as good as it used to be.
To embark upon, in modern society both mother and father have been working relentlessly not only to meet the end needs in this expensive world but also to cope up and to compete with their peers. As a result of it, either knowingly or unknowingly they end up having no quality time with kids. This would eventually lead to loneliness in pupils and undoubtedly has adverse effects on them. On top of it, few of them would admit their youngsters at early schooling establishments such as kinder gardens, nursery schools to encourage them to study harder.
Apart from these, working mothers have been spending their free time or weekends with other household activities for instance shopping, running errands. Although these are crucial, they are not allocating enough time for children. Thus, kids will never know the value of relationships when they grow up. In addition to it, most of the parents have been addicted to computers and TV and they do provide electronic gadgets to children so that they can engage themselves in front of screens. These would cause early eyesight as well as depression in the younger generation.
To conclude, apparently modern lifestyle and gadgets have been detrimental to the parent-child association and it also has several demerits on next-generation such as loneliness, health issues, and depression.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, so, thus, well, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19047619048 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87020822208 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3788513847 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.384615385 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247880266034 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771040543232 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617344919346 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137213951904 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604524615229 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.