Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding.
Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages?
It is often argued that government of respective country should provide the scholarship to the subject which can address the need of society than general course. The advantage of this outweighs the drawbacks. The essay will first demonstrate the fact that eradication of social problem is the biggest advantage of this followed by an analysis of how it creates the primary disadvantage namely inequality provision.
The principle advantage of providing university fee of selective student who have pursuing their higher degree related to social problem definitely help to make social cohesion. It allows pupils plenty of free time to get update with the multiple social issues and their way forward to dissolve these problem by minimizing their financial burden. As a consequence of that, learner will equipped with more specialized vision and dimension and able to initiate at the social context where such problem are deeply rooted. For instance, this is most evident in my country that Tribhuwan University announced scholarship provision only to the student of social sciences every year than other faculties in Nepal.
Despite these advantages it impairs student from the provision of social justice from government mechanism itself. The state of equality teaches students regarding compassion, coordination and we feeling to everyone thereby mobilizing them to eradicate the social disparity is even feasible. For example, The Himalayan Times in March 2019 reported that 15 percent of national crime rate in Nepal has decreased because of the multidisciplinary consciousness regarding social problems and its solution.
In conclusion, the fact that offering tuition fee by the state government to the learners who are undertaking their higher education in social concern benefits them to have more scientific knowledge on the subject matter clearly outweigh the flawed argument that it impairs them from the sense of discrimination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...vantage namely inequality provision. The principle advantage of providing univer...
^^^
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: IN_PRINCIPAL[3]
Message: Did you mean 'principal' (=main)?
Suggestion: principal
...age namely inequality provision. The principle advantage of providing university fee o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...ssues and their way forward to dissolve these problem by minimizing their financial burden. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'equip'
Suggestion: equip
... As a consequence of that, learner will equipped with more specialized vision and dimens...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55892255892 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89557199861 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602693602694 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.4447275643 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.090909091 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115228603409 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437006670434 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498896420698 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725003672882 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212280111008 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.