modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.
To what extent is this a positive or a negative development ?
There is no denying that with the considerably innovated technology, especially the Internet, accessing or even downloading some copyrighted materials without purchasing such as music, books becomes much more comfortable. From my perspective, I believe that this tendency has more demerits than merits.
There are some benefits for users or listeners. One of them is that, by not being charging, the fan of books or music can have more chances to hear or read when they can not afford the fee. Indeed, the price to access these materials sometimes can be seen as luxury items for some people, particular in Africa. Sci-hub is a compelling illustration in this case, which is the non-profit website for students or researchers in developing countries to download some high-cost science journals.
Apart from those advantages I expressed above, this trend still has a plethora of unfavorable influence on the economy. In a view about the authors, they have their rights to sell their works, which are employed as their earnings. The way of illegal copying or leaking trigger some obstacle for them to continuing their works; thus, they are likely to leave their current jobs as writers or composers. Moreover, the suppliers of these materials are also adversely impacted on a financial basis in virtue of paying more and more money for the protection of author rights. That means, they will confront problems if their products are illegally used or copied.
In conclusion, although this trend can help to access the desired artworks easily, it still contribute to the obstacle for both suppliers and authors who create genuine works.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contributes'?
Suggestion: contributes
...s the desired artworks easily, it still contribute to the obstacle for both suppliers and ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, thus, apart from, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19245283019 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73982534725 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630188679245 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8367449422 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188939455225 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664005451752 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437016347073 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113589496411 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453424027397 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.