In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or to use animal products, for example, clothing and medicines.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Hitherto, globalization has led to the interference of credo about animal treating, and the question of whether human beings should stop killing them for society’s need or not has been appealing public concentration. While many people lament that residents must treat animals equally, I oppose this view by giving some rational evidence.
It is conspicuous that fauna has been an irreplaceable part of human diet since the Stone age. Ancient people found that animals contain tons of vitamins and bacterias which can strengthen residents’ physical health, and it is still true in this day and age. Further and more important, though, some of these vitamins can prevent people from some dangerous diseases, so it is unreasonable to limit animals’ products. A minority of citizens argue that there is artificial food made from natural ingredients; however, it is criminally expensive so this type of food can not supply enough residents’ demand. There was a news that discussing whether people prefer to be a vegetarian in 1 year or not, in the result, less than 20% of the total disagree. This survey pointed out that human beings’ preferences still leans forward to meat-consumer.
On the other hand, fauna’s product is the one issue that having global attention. Notwithstanding some citizens’ approval that these types of clothes or medicines should vanish from the prevailing market, this vanity economy knowledge must be taken into consideration. A variety of companies all over the world are using animals as their best-selling components, whereby, the shortage of animals consumption can badly pose a threat to the economy, especially in clothing. Furthermore, animal products are the signal of high-quality items, so they can shield customers from buying substandard products.
By way of conclusion, animals still play a vital role in our daily life, so we can not replace them with anything else
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...nce of credo about animal treating, and the question of whether human beings should stop killing them f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 615, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...ply enough residents’ demand. There was a news that discussing whether people prefer t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, still, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32565789474 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98998320517 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651315789474 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6044140281 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.538461538 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154362678329 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496602730914 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426893405777 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092010416481 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508491096172 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.