In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals for food, clothing or medicine. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is universally accepted that humans are using animals for multi-purposes since their creation in this world. Whether today, they should kill animals for their basic needs namely food, clothing and medicines is a controversial issue. This essay will argue that some animals are meant to be killed for the sake of the survival of the food chain and more importantly, technology will never be able to produce such essentials for people living on earth.
To commence with, it is worth considering that nature always follows certain trends for the survival of all the living things on the planet earth. If we stop hunting animals for reasons such as food or clothing, they would be overpopulated and as a consequence, they might enter into the human residency areas and attack us. Moreover, animals and humans both are omnivores who eat plants and other animals which helps both of them keep a balanced and healthy diet. For instance, a simple human food chain indulges humans who eat plants (grows fruits and vegetables) and plants produce their food from sunlight.
Conversely, many believe that in the present era, technology has considerably improvised and there is a high probability that they will provide solutions to every human problem. However, needless to say, it is not the case. In fact, all of the countless results ever produced by artificial intelligence or science used animals or their parts to some extent. One prominent example is medicine itself. Evidently, medicines are without a doubt, first tested on animals in order to achieve the expected results before actually out in the market for humans.
Taking everything into consideration, it is more likely that humans will always need animals for all the basic needs in their lives. Therefore, It seems to me that the continuation of the food chain is an absolute imperative that is entirely justified despite enhancements by humans in technologies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ss to say, it is not the case. In fact, all of the countless results ever produced by arti...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11746031746 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73194847207 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568253968254 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6699003274 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.142857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207217543099 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734954427742 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502965037517 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1278056307 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533301459553 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.