in the modern world, more and more emphasis is being replaced on the acquisition of practical skills rather than knowledge from books and other resources. discuss both advantages and disadvantages of this trend.
It is considered by some in this present day that people focus more on acquiring practical skills instead of theoretical knowledge from books in order to get a job and in work. This essay will describe the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomena in detail.
On the one hand, concentrating more on practical skills will give people two benefits. The first argument is it will let students to gain real experiences. It could happen because, there are some fields that they can not find on the text books and will be fully understand by straight to do it. For example, although we could learn about communication skill from books but it is not easy as in theory. The second argument is getting a job will be easier and faster. This means, people will acquire a specific technical expertise that is closer to daily tasks in work life. Moreover, some companies put words such as 'is a plus' for certain skills on their requirement. Thus, it could trigger students to burst their skills.
On the other hand, there are two drawbacks of too emphasising on practical skills. Firstly, it causes students having a narrow-minded. In the other word, in our daily work, people deal with different problems to solve. Practical learning only teaches us on one case, but knowledge give us the core as a foundation to handle various things. Secondly, it will not improve our knowledge and makes our life stagnant. By looking back to the past, our inventor could made such a great inventions because they learned the basic formula and improved it. Therefore we can enjoy things namely komputer, internet, or smart electric.
All in all, practical skills and theoretical are important. Consequently, we have to balance them so we will gain benefit a lot from it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ibe the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomena in detail. On the one hand...
^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...lls. Firstly, it causes students having a narrow-minded. In the other word, in our daily work, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e stagnant. By looking back to the past, our inventor could made such a great inv...
^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...g back to the past, our inventor could made such a great inventions because they le...
^^^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'invention'?
Suggestion: invention
..., our inventor could made such a great inventions because they learned the basic formula ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...rned the basic formula and improved it. Therefore we can enjoy things namely komputer, in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8762541806 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71436775448 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4858276169 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.7368421053 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7368421053 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1925533808 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551226851319 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583991147968 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130567976172 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833354386527 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.