The money spent by government on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals.To what extend do you argee or disagree.
It sometimes would be argued that instead of spending on space discovery, the official organization should provide public subsides for public services. I do not agree with this statement.
It is certainly true that the space ties closely to the progress of human. There are a variety reasons why people should ruin space programmes. First of all, human need to know exactly what are the things surrounding us or the things that they have absorbed so far. People have to understand it to prevent the earth from natural disasters and explain weird things appearing in our lives through the signals given in the space. For an example, due to the development of these programmes,human nowadays are capable of forecasting virtually the weather such as temperatures, frog, rainy, storms and dangerous places to alert people to move out before it happens.
Secondly, through studies of the space, scientists found out many planets near the earth such as Jupiter, Venus. It is worthy to invest in because the world is becoming overpopulated, a demand to people that exploiting new planets that have the same conditions as the earth to prepare to a human movement predicted for along time ago. One more reason for supporting to space programmes is that the curiosity of people should be answered that whether aliens are surviving or not. There are historical documents writing about that but experts still do not have any evidence to prove it. Human deserve to know the truth.
In conclusion, although I accept that public services are important, I still suppose that the authorities should be encouraged to keep going on research the space.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put between 'would' and 'be'.
Suggestion: would sometimes be
It sometimes would be argued that instead of spending on spac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 485, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , human
...e to the development of these programmes,human nowadays are capable of forecasting vir...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: FOR_ALONG_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for a long time'?
Suggestion: for a long time
...o prepare to a human movement predicted for along time ago. One more reason for supporting to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: ALONG_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a long time'?
Suggestion: a long time
...epare to a human movement predicted for along time ago. One more reason for supporting to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, secondly, so, still, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0442804428 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73419035515 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605166051661 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.455372557 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.153846154 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138108521719 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480096781278 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398768304083 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972581494259 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358697887451 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.