More and more companies are allowing employees to work at home. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
With the advances of technology and the Internet, an increasing number of corporations encourage their employees to work from home for the last few decades. This number shows exponential growth since the start of the pandemic at the beginning of 2020. It should be seen as a positive development since it provides employee flexibility and reduces the company's overhead cost.
The most important aspect of working from home is the flexibility which it offers. This means to say each person has their own unique experience with remote working and finding what works or does not work. For example, an employee can take a break or lunch at their desired time, or feel no rush to hang up on family members if they call. Moreover, they can save a lot of money and time daily just being not driving and getting caught in traffic. This way employee avoids paying the high price of parking as well as buying lunch and coffee. Therefore, remote working can be seen as the right choice for employees.
The biggest remote working advantages for enterprise employers revolve around generating revenue and employee productivity. Working from home can save a lot for a company in commercial space rental, electricity, and water bill, interior decoration, and overhead personnel. Ultimately at the end of the fiscal year, this working culture leads to generate profit on the company’s behalf. In addition, studies show that people working at home are 20%-25% more effective and productive than their office counterparts. Not only are there fewer social distractions, but there are also opportunities to take a necessary break when needed which physiologists say helps with overall performance, motivation, and creativity.
In conclusion, remote work has become the new normal for global business and enterprise employers. All in all, this new culture has many positives for both employers and employees as it can improve wellbeing and lower cost.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t can improve wellbeing and lower cost.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1974522293 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78831795659 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59872611465 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1514406787 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236214816905 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753248480117 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507162934437 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141925356134 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526146263325 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.