More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation. Describe some of problems over reliance on cars can cause, and suggest at least one possible solution.

Technology is a faithful servant but a dangerous master. Nowadays people prefer to use the technological blessings including the mode of trasportation and this is why they are willing to travel in their own owened cars. However, it tends to increase the detrimental effects to the environments as well as to the individuals. In this essay, I will highlight some problems of this phenomenon and also provide some solutions in order to ameliorate this situation.

There are multifarious demerits of private cars. First and foremost, it is incrasing the global warming treand. In other words, as the number of private cars increases, the emmision of harmful gasses such as CO, CO2 also escalated which lead to different health hassles like asthma, high blood pressure. Secondly, the natural resources are decreasing rapidly because the private vechiles count is emarging day by day. Despite of the alarming condition of the preserved resources such as oil, individuals prefer to own their own cars. Finally, people are becoming more physically unfit as do not want to come out from their comfort zones. To be precise, private vechiles are giving them more comfort as compared to public ones. For instance, according to an article published in the U.S Times, more that 20% people are unhealthy who have own private cars as compared to the those people who do not have any car. Additionally, this rapid increase of private cars responsible for traffic congestions.

However, some steps can be taken in order to eradicate this problem. Firstly, government should focus on investing more on the solar energy driven cars. Because it will prevent the decreasing level of natural resources. In addition, they can be helpful to our environment too. Secondly, from individual level, we should travel more on the public trasports. While individuals avail more public trasports like railways or public buses, the traffic congestion will be reduced significantly. Moreover, it also beneficial for the health of people. Instead of sitting inside a private car, people should walk whenever they get the opportunity which is a healthy habit. Lat but not the list, education on the current environmental crisis is required to understand the harmful effects of private vechiles. Not only it can mitigate this mammoth problem but also they may come out with some better ideas in order to scrb this situations.

To conclude, I would like to reiterate my opinion by saying that, with the collaboration efforts from individuals and the elected officials, we can eradicate this ubiquitous problem which is causing by the private cars.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 785, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...ording to an article published in the U.S Times, more that 20% people are unhealt...
^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g more on the solar energy driven cars. Because it will prevent the decreasing level of...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 912, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...with some better ideas in order to scrb this situations. To conclude, I would lik...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20616113744 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81653488503 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535545023697 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6744024774 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5416666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5833333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220459361663 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561011411621 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442688862337 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121845218569 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622219510689 0.056905535591 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.