More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses. Why? Who benefits more from this, the community or these young people?
An ever-increasing number of young people from developed countries are prone to take part in voluntary workds in communities in developing countries. To explain this trend, there are some hidden motives which incline them to do so. Also, I believe that both these young people and the community are equally entitled with benefits.
There are two explainations why youth in wealthy countries are choosing to spend time helping communities in less developed countries. Firstly, some individuals believe that it is a decen work and that is their responsibility to contribute their time and hard work in order to accomplish it. Regadless of teaching or builing house or repairing roads, these young people are always willing to take part in. Secondly, having chance to experience different cultures with exotic customs is another reason young people sign up for these voluntary works. Some of my friends, for example, deciding to work for a project of a non-governement organisation in Malaysia for about a year said they had never felt blessful before since they joined this program.
I think these short but valuable time of working in deprivilged communities brings out benefits for both young people and these communities equally. As for young people, having a certificate of taking part in voluntary work in another country without doubt helps to polish their resume. Thereby, chances of working in foreign companies or non-government organisations will open for them. Also, communities can be beneficial from these projects. Children living in these areas, for example, in their first time learn how to read and write from enthusiastic foreign teachers, which makes them excited and long for learning.
In conclusion, it seems to me that desire to make the world a better place and chance to live in different cultures are the two reasons for young people help poor communities. Both these people and communities are beneficial from these projects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, as for, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29392971246 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86676730582 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552715654952 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2191772942 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.466666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329402083 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126914814751 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823910776673 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224237334391 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289765999547 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.