More people put their personal information online ( address, telephone number,...) for everyday activities such as socailizing on social networks or banking purpose. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays there are a surge number of individuals public the address or private numbers of their own on a wide range of social media. In spite of being quite common, personally, I believe that this is a detrimental development, as will now be argued.
On the one hand, it finds hard to deny the several merits it brings to inhabitants. Firstly, the people are believed not to struggle to vivid numerous passwords or complicated codes including both letters and figures. In the other words, these online website on the Internet network play as tablets or assisted tools that will be responsable for auto-remembering entered datas, which leads users not to have to type their password characters to log in to the next time. Secondly, saving the kinds of information, particularly home, accommodation and location seems to closer person to person bond. This is exemplified by the fact that today, thanks to the introduction of app called "Nearby friend", which generate a list of individuals they may know base on the address given, more and more the Vietnamese are having a tendency to broaden social circle such as looking for new frends being living similar regions of them. Therefore, it leads to create a number of opportunities to get acquainted with strangers as well as shortening the distance of humankind.
Nevertheless, despite the benefits mentioned above, I still tend to side with those whose opinion is believe people could face several acute drawbacks from socializing the personally indentiable information.The major reason is that the those individual details stand a massive risks of being leaked out due to the weak cybersecurity in variety of virtual pages on the wireless network system. For instance, most of computer- based places, especially fahshon stores in Danang, Hanoi or HCM city in Vietnam, customers always tend to leave their telephone numbers, current living address, even paying in account whenever they purchase remotely items, which leads online frauds to take advantage of illegally accessing these identifiable datas as well as stealing them for some bad purposes. By the same token, being dramatically virtual abused as well as the users' imagines be used in banned websites. To illustrate, the huge number of famous Korean stars and idols, recently, have been stolen personal photos to upload into sex explicit and harmful pages. This may create detrimental impacts on the psychological issues such as depression and trauma as well as destroying the fame and reputation.
In conclusion, for aforementioned reasons, I still subscribe to people who believe it is a negative advancement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 756, Rule ID: KNOW_NOW[5]
Message: Did you mean 'now'?
Suggestion: now
...generate a list of individuals they may know base on the address given, more and mor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... the personally indentiable information.The major reason is that the those individu...
^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'risk'?
Suggestion: risk
...hose individual details stand a massive risks of being leaked out due to the weak cyb...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 734, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f illegally accessing these identifiable datas as well as stealing them for some ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in spite of, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2213.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24407582938 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97489646619 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618483412322 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.793577463 49.4020404114 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 158.071428571 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1428571429 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2142857143 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193298909598 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555357819835 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043418796018 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116081768386 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017132692173 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.