Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals; during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Traditional festival is a soul of the nation and each of it has delivered a special meaning. But nowadays, those meaning is almost be forgotten, even when it is held, the main purpose is only for serving people enjoyment. On my experiences, I totally agree with this point of view.
The deep meaning of the festival is gradually faded. When people were asked about history, most of them give the incorrect answer or choose the long-winded reply. Moreover, in the developed world, people live more scientifically and less dependent on God, and they are busy with their work. Thus, the ceremonial of religion is cut, leading fewer people who feel the sense of festival from generation to generation.
Modern people are keen on creation and innovation, include traditional festivals. The more attractive decorations, the more visitors come. Most people enjoy the games after the ceremony. For example, in the traditional boat race, the ceremony is really boring with a long speech, and no one focuses on it while people gather and stand alongside the riverbank, cheer their team in an exciting atmosphere. Besides, on this occasion, the ceremony is always as same as years before, but if it has a special and impressive scenery, visitors will be attracted and the number of participants will increase. Therefore, the main aim of joining the festival is just for fun.
In conclusion, the meaning of religious festivals is missed in this busy world. There is no doubt that modern people experience in their own way, firstly for themselves.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03137254902 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78087608831 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603921568627 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7153181476 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5333333333 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298821281364 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970162052335 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511201123226 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183092858876 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229652742738 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.