As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing.
What factors contribute to job satisfaction?
How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers?
Workers from generation to generation have devoted over half of their lives to their occupation. Hence, it is true that job enjoyment plays an integral part in people's welfare. Passion and money appear to be factors that attribute to job satisfaction and this important element of employment seems to vary among different individuals.
Being passionate about a certain occupation could not only bring people's joy but also beneficial to their wellbeing. Indeed, if people interested in their jobs, they would be delighted to work around the clock which in turn, decreases stress and enhances their overall mental health. Moreover, money can be another possible factor for job satisfaction. In this day and age, workers have to earn a large amount of money to pay for sustenance costs and to satisfy their children's needs. Thus, getting a well-paid job can either accommodate those expenses or increases people's quality of life. As to some current surveys, individuals who receive 100,000$ a month can get 45% higher in job fulfillment than those with only one-third of that money.
Although job satisfaction is of paramount importance, it does not seem to appeal to all employees in a universal way. Many people can happily enter their dream workforce, and the inverse is true for individuals with a lack of knowledge or practical skills. Even in some cases, people spare their time for job that neither suits their interest nor their personality as the job can fulfill one part of their satisfaction at work which is a high salary. Consequently, it is logical to say that a person's preferences for jobs can be based on one factor that meets their contemporary demand.
In conclusion, interest and money are the two logical elements of job enjoyment. Employers should implement some initiatives to boost either of these elements in order to accelerate the productivity of their corporations
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Workers from generation to generation ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to vary among different individuals. Being passionate about a certain occupat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 659, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$000'.
Suggestion: $000
...nt surveys, individuals who receive 100,000$ a month can get 45% higher in job fulfi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ose with only one-third of that money. Although job satisfaction is of paramoun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a universal way" with adverb for "universal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...oes not seem to appeal to all employees in a universal way. Many people can happily enter their dr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that meets their contemporary demand. In conclusion, interest and money are th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, third, thus, well, as to, in conclusion, in some cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 2260.96107784 70% => OK
No of words: 309.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13915857605 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85772428989 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 204.123752495 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595469255663 0.468620217663 127% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 705.55239521 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9945093606 57.8364921388 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.866666667 119.503703932 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 5.70786347227 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367366567249 0.218282227539 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123394576122 0.0743258471296 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071673594865 0.0701772020484 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224818146911 0.128457276422 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868499910869 0.0628817314937 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.3799401198 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 98.500998004 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.