In most successful organizations, some people believe that communication between managers and workers are the most important factor, other people say that other factors are more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
opinions are divided as to what should be considered the most significant in the success of organisations. Many hold a firm belief that mutual communication between managers and employees plays the decisive role, while others emphasise the importance of other factors. From my perspective, both ideas have their own merits, and therefore seem equally vital, which will be meticulously discussed as follows.
On the one hand, those who favour the idea of successful organisations relying heavily on manager-worker communication assert their own compelling reasons. they view managerial levels and employees as the bond of any multi-level organisations; thus, better communication between these two factors might pave way for improving productivity and guaranteeing corporate operation. In fact, managers act as policy makers who are responsible for development plans and strategy implementation, and guides employees through the execution of policies. During this process, if any problems arise, they will be immediately reported back to managerial levels by employees through proper communication channels such as email and online applications for further appropriate modifications. As a result, this top-down approach is highly likely to deter both managers and workers from misunderstanding, thereby offering ample opportunity for organisations to thrive in the long run.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that several factors concerning corporate culture and work policies should not be underestimated. Noticeably, most successful organisations often reflect stringent work ethics and thorough understanding of various regulations as for confidentiality amongst both managerial and employee levels. A typical example would relate to Vin Group - the currently most prestigious organisation in Vietnam that is demanding in terms of dress code, punctuality and professionalism. Furthermore, sustainable development does not go without a lack of well-qualified employees, which places more emphasis on suitable work policies to avoid redundancy. amongst such policies, promotion opportunities, pay rise, sick and maternity leaves, and compensation are the most outstanding considerations that deserve the attention of the board of directors towards a more prosperous organisation.
In conclusion, despite the fact that well-developed organisations might imply effective and transparent manager - employee communication, I contend that corporate culture and employment policies are also necessarily taken into account for future stable development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Opinions
opinions are divided as to what should be consid...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...ficant in the success of organisations. Many hold a firm belief that mutual communication...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...on assert their own compelling reasons. they view managerial levels and employees as...
^^^^
Line 5, column 677, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Amongst
...able work policies to avoid redundancy. amongst such policies, promotion opportunities,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, as to, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 6.11666666667 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53017490437 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641666666667 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.5455338312 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.285714286 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218068626845 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700219100376 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518220185519 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120785967409 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732493363326 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.0946893788 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.51 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.