Nowadays, overpopulation has become a more debatable topic in the world. While it has been suggested that most of all problems in the world are caused by the population, I think natural disasters have a more significant role in problems than the former view. I will argue why some agree with the statement and why j disagree with it.
Those who think that overpopulation is a major reason for all problems on the earth have their justifications. Firstly, if the population increases, the need for medical facilities, jobs, food, and education will rise. It inclines the poverty and unemployment rate almost in all countries, resulting in more hospitals, factories, and other services will be needed. Since the rate of population increased by 10% from 1990 in India, for instance, the number of unemployed citizens rose by 50% throughout the time. Hence, the more rise population happen, the more number of poorer and jobless ones in the world.
On the other hand, several other factors play a more significant role in dangerous consequences in the world than the population such as natural disasters, the spread of diseases, and many others. When one of the hazard crises happens in a particular area, it destroys many functional hospitals, schools, public buildings, transportation, and many demolished. It has resulted in a lack of medical treatments for humans, leading to a number of illnesses spreading. For example, in Japan, when the tsunami occurred in 2015, as a result, flu and cold among citizens were inclined by 40%. Therefore, the greater effect of natural problems, the greater it will affect mankind.
In conclusion, overpopulation creates several obstacles in the world even though naturally occurring problems have more effects than it. In my words, despite having many problems of overpopulation, earthquakes, droughts, sea-level rise, and many other ones have more dangerous than it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27124183007 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00717704162 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8084531354 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.533333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167202634748 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555490529631 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683703377371 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11999622074 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108469575864 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.