The natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What problems does it cause? How can we solve these problems?
The production rates in most countries have surged over the past centuries. Humans are rapidly depleting the paramount sources of elements that they employ in their existence. This essay will discuss the primary issue behind this trend as well as propose some feasible approaches to tackle it.
The main problem associated with excessive natural resources consumption is considered to be the insufficiency of them in the nearest future. This means that factories that require raw materials will cease their operations, that can inevitably entail the collapse of economy. Therefore, the living standards of the majority of population are highly likely to diminish. According to the UN report dated 2018, the crude oil reserves will have been completely depleted by 2035, if the current rate of acquisition is maintained. In other words, heavy manufacturers’ reliance on wood, gas, coal and oil poses a giant threat not only to the global economy, but also to wellbeing of ordinary people.
In order to overcome the above-mention concerns producers should switch to renewable sources. Alternative sources of energy are capable to provide the demanded capacity in a short time. Hence, factory owners can arrange the transition towards unconventional forms of resources in an efficient way. For example, a recent study concluded that the energy derived from wind farms comprises 50% of power supply in Germany, which in its turn proves that the developed countries move on to new sources of power. Thus, manufacturers ought to transform to employ materials that defy exhaustion.
In conclusion, this essay highlighted the staple/core consequences of uncontrolled usage of limited resources and suggested a viable resolution to conserve them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 52, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...oblem associated with excessive natural resources consumption is considered to be the ins...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...wards unconventional forms of resources in an efficient way. For example, a recent study concluded ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45555555556 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96666666667 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685185185185 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.503265164 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.214285714 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103064289119 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0293774859109 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438037484285 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.049465832607 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399026721389 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.