NECESSITY OF TEACHERS IN CLASSROOM
Today, technology has become a vital part of the development of educational systems all over the world. While I accept that digital devices can make a huge contribution to the effective acquirements of learners, I believe the roles of teachers at school is irreplaceable.
On the one hand, integrating processing equipment into classrooms can be efficient, serviceable and functional. Students often pay more attention to lessons displayed or illustrated on modern devices because those things could make the lessons more updatable and vivid while traditional teaching methods are too familiar and sometimes boring with learners. Moreover, technology could encourage students to self-study, help them cooperate with friends easily when it comes to school projects and facilitate them to improve their technical skills.
However, I would argue that people shouldn't allow processing equipment to take the place of educators at school. From an educational perspective, students attend school not only to acquire academic knowledge but also to learn soft skills and build a good personality. And through the love and the interaction in classroom, educators are able to create a positive school environment and teach their students to be responsible, to be respectful towards adults, to be friendly and cooperative with their friends, what digital devices are not capable of teaching and conveying. Furthermore, teachers has the ability to understand the weaknesses and strengths of each students in the class and base on these points to find the suitable way help their students rectify their deficiencies.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the necessity of teachers in classroom is unarguable and technology is just a useful tool for educators to strengthen the quality of all lessons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
.... However, I would argue that people shouldnt allow processing equipment to take the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06835074714 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605072463768 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5389131055 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.8 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152699131575 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600654539432 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914140674944 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118546342275 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112656279512 0.056905535591 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.