New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Children, nowadays, tend to devote their spare time to use technological devices rather than enjoy other activities. Although this trend has negative impacts, I believe that the advantages of this change are more than outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, perhaps playing electric games and using the Internet are two main reasons lead children to become technological addicts. Firstly, exercise is essential for the physical development of children. Thus, taking part in outdoor activities with friends and parents is an integral part of maintaining their lifestyle. Secondly, those who use smartphone or computers usually keep their eyes glued to screens in a very concentrated way for a long time. They may suffer from eye-strain. Furthermore, waves from hi-fi devices also tend to cause headaches if used for too long.
On the other hand, I believe that technologies provide to youngsters more benefits than such disadvantages. One of the reasons is that the Internet contains the majority of sources of information so that is a vast benefit for children can learn online from self-study materials. For instance, besides learning English in school, pupils can improve their English skills at home by studying from English forums such as tienganh123.com or hellochao.com. Another reason is that they have countless opportunities to broaden their knowledge and communicate with friends in many parts of the world. Facebook, for example, is a social network which has a wide circle of virtual friends that youngsters can access and discover many friends.
In conclusion, despite obvious disadvantages about this trend, I would argue that these are more outweighed by the benefits.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.262798634812 0.247107183377 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.139931740614 0.155533422707 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.098976109215 0.0946595960268 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0477815699659 0.0501214627716 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0341296928328 0.0437548338989 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.156996587031 0.122226691241 128% => OK
Participles: 0.0273037542662 0.0403226058552 68% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96051989189 2.80594681477 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0238907849829 0.0326793684256 73% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0819112627986 0.0861772015684 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0170648464164 0.021408717616 80% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00682593856655 0.011925033212 57% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1691.0 1933.35771543 87% => OK
No of words: 264.0 316.048096192 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.4053030303 6.12580529183 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20517956788 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.405303030303 0.374742101984 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.344696969697 0.28420135186 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.231060606061 0.203846283523 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.147727272727 0.137316102897 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96051989189 2.80594681477 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.037074148 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643939393939 0.56093040696 115% => OK
Word variations: 73.3903237875 60.7387585426 121% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0891783567 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.8571428571 20.7743622355 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4827494736 49.517814964 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.785714286 127.492653851 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7743622355 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.14285714286 0.814263465372 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 53.3268398268 49.1944974215 108% => OK
Elegance: 2.01538461538 1.69124875643 119% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266997017656 0.332605444948 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0669159161957 0.102741220458 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.051812486572 0.0668466124924 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.475671230756 0.534860350844 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.185306985214 0.148594505496 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964417895335 0.134430193775 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075542078537 0.0742795772207 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.218128075418 0.324371583561 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0623940735719 0.0638462369009 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172235705028 0.228012699653 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376572625365 0.058150111329 65% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.5751503006 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.