New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages?
The development of technology affected to young people's leisure activities. While this may cause some negative impacts, I believe that the benefits are greater.
To begin with, smart devices have substantially created convenience in entertainment. Nowadays, with a ton of resources on the internet, children are easier to find songs which they love and listen everywhere with portable devices such as mobile phone, tablet. Even they can request virtual assistant on their phone to look for any songs and play it automatically. Besides that, enjoying free time also enhances language skills. The reason is that many software developers develop games which include education content, leading to learning new vocabulary and be familiar with new languages.
Nevertheless, overuse of technology causes bad effect on body health. Most smart devices require electricity, meaning that children need to stay at home to recharge them when running out of battery. The lack of outdoor activities such as jogging, playing team game are the main factor. This is also one of the most controversial topics about cons of cutting edge technology. Moreover, some video games impact significantly to the awareness of children. Those game consist of violence scene or sexual scenery. Children tend to imitate what they see on game day by day and can become criminal in future. Soon or later, it may create aggressive behavior and easily cause physical or emotional harm to their classmate.
To sum up, technology brings both positive effects and bad sides to children's life. At present, I believe the benefits outweigh the negative consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...game day by day and can become criminal in future. Soon or later, it may create aggressiv...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, in fact, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.390625 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83057343945 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69140625 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The sentence length is short
Sentence length SD: 31.7954099971 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1764705882 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0588235294 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16320669037 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434901060174 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0232554408897 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892317804703 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153344720041 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.39 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.