Nowadays, in this modern world with technological developments, computer games are interesting and enjoyable for children undoubtedly. There are numerous of debates between social researchers about fundamental reasons and effects of these games among children during recent years.
Some social experts classified several significant reasons for this phenomenon as consequences of their investigations. In their opinion, first and most prominent logical reason of this tendency is attraction of these games for children. Actually, graphical and visual aspects of these games are very attractive for children to play and led to increase utilizing these games in all countries. Similarly, second reason of this approach in contemporary century is decreasing the number of children in wide variety of societies because of distributing decrease population policy in them. As a result, children don`t have sufficient partners to play with them. Recent published reports in U.S. illustrated that the number of children in this country declined more than 30% during last 20 years.
On the other aspect, there are diversity of ideas about beneficial and detrimental effects of these games for children. Numerous of psychologists are unanimous in detrimental influences of these games on children`s brain. They insist that distributing this event in different societies causes to creating some considerable mental and physical issues for children. According to last investigation in European countries, two third of children who play computer games are reluctant to eat enough food and it caused to decreasing their normal weight. On the other hand, some experts argue that these games because of increasing innovation can be profitable for children and make them more creative. They emphasize that these games can increase children`s imagination power. In these experts` opinion, families can control amount of playing for their children and they claim that even playing in normal time is very essential for children totally.
In conclusion, by pursuing this development pattern in technology, increasing attention of children to computer games are unavoidable. I believe that educational planners and families play big roles to protect children from inappropriate and perilous effects of these games. They can devise some applicable plans for children to share their time in their lessons, sport activities and computer games properly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, second, similarly, so, third, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75757575758 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0481044872 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517906336088 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8761331724 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.111111111 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204582293616 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819018737876 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037402241241 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152741940255 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320835829293 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.