Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about animals are of controversy which is used for testing medicines and alternative products before going to practice. While this activity should not be carried out because of the morally wrong, I do believe that people can make the most of animal experiments when they urgently need.
On the one hand, using the method based on the animal must be prohibited. One reason is that individuals will destroy the lives of all creatures. To use a common example of this practice, mice are used to determine the effectiveness of the drug but they will be vulnerable. Therefore, these experiments will affect part of the biodiversity. Another reason is that animal testings may fail in human since scientists cannot accurately predict how they will behave in people based on laboratory and animal studies, so it will be the bad science.
On the other hand, in some cases, it may be a necessary therapy. Firstly, it aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. For example, many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more. As a result, people will be saved and it seems justified. Secondly, scientists typically use animals for testing purposes because they are considered similar to humans, and alternative methods of testing do not simulate humans in the same way. As such, researchers do recognise the limitations and differences but the testing is done on animals because they are thought to be the closest match and the best one with regards to applying this data to humans.
In conclusion, while human health will benefit from animal testing to some extent, I argue that people should not place too much value on these methods.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in some cases, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08474576271 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71119907092 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566101694915 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9792508479 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.142857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325043795524 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107644158665 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684127280804 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210071502195 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479393482578 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.