Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the necessity of checking the side effects of new medicines and safety of other products such as cosmetics, beauty products, and food additives have propelled researchers toward using laboratory animals before carrying any clinical trials on humans. Some people may believe that animal testing is wasteful and cruel, while others may find it helpful. In this essay, more light will be shed on the both sides.
Conducting experiments on animals may bring detrimental disadvantages including waste of effort as well as inflicting cruelty on living beings. To begin with, although there are some biological resemblances between human and some creatures like monkeys, rats, and rabbits, it does not necessarily mean that treatments have similar upshots on both of them. In other words, there is not ample evidence approving that if a medical procedure or a remedy is successful for some specific animals in laboratories, it will similarly work for human beings too. So, such examinations on animals are just useless spending of energy and budget. Furthermore, it is unethical to sentence animals to live in a laboratory for a period of time, being exposed to various treatments which may subsequently lead to their death. Animals have the same rights as humans to live freely. Captivating them in a cage to carry out a diversity of experiments not only hurts them but also shortens their lifespan, causing them to suffer from pain, loneliness, and fear.
Turning to the other side of the argument, there is a group of proponents considering animal testing as an effective solution, for it ensures the scientists of the safety and efficiency of medical processes. The supporters are of the opinion that humans are more important than all other species in the world, deserving to benefit from a great health. This is not feasible unless the researchers invent modern therapies for diseases such as cancers and AIDS, and test them on animals to check their successfulness. Therefore, applying treatments on animals seems almost inevitable to find appropriate medical procedures. Moreover, those who advocate testing on animals assert that the species being used in the experiments do not belong to the wild animals’ group. So the demise of them does not affect the environment, nor does it disturb the animals’ life cycle.
All in all, considering both sides of arguments, I can conclude that the demerits of performing medicinal examinations on animals far outweigh the advantages, since these tests are not only inhuman but also disable to propose accurate results. Instead, computer modeling can be employed by professionals to simulate an almost real situation to study the cases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 712, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e animals to live in a laboratory for a period of time, being exposed to various treatments wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...most real situation to study the cases.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, well, while, such as, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2272.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 431.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27146171694 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91067077315 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573085846868 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4786813535 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.222222222 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9444444444 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311025465861 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891659085837 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578203320279 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182770808653 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636411445507 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.