Nowadays, in this competitive and complicated world, circumstance of education in university as foundation of continuous improvement is one of the most prominent challenges in all societies. There were numerous debates about beneficial or detrimental impacts of distance-learning programs among educational experts during these years.
Some educational planners argue that distance-learning programs because of several considerable reasons is profitable for students and society. In their opinion, in this way because of sufficient time to researches, works and operational experiences, all lessons and activities are more applicable in comparison with traditional method. Recent published reports in U.S. illustrated that the number of volunteers for distance-learning programs have been increased more than 20% in recent decade in this country. During comprehensive researches these students claimed that they can fulfill job and study simultaneously and it was the main reason of this tendency between them. One of the other significant reasons of selecting this type of education is lower cost of this education program in comparison with original one. Actually, because of eliminating transportation to university and cost of tutors, students can diminish their education cost in this method.
On the other hand, some other educational experts argue that original type of learning in universities and colleges because of face to face method of education and competition atmosphere in class, is more appropriate for students. These experts emphasize that in traditional method of education tutors because of their experiences and knowledge play influenced role in students` comprehend of lessons. Furthermore, students can consult and collaborate with each other to solve their fundamental issues during their education period. These experts insist that in addition to educational aspects, being in a class with wide variety of behavior, motivation and innovation can increase social communications vigor among students in university.
In conclusion, by pursuing this pattern of distance-learning programs in universities, because of numerous of advantages for students, the number of students in this method will increase undoubtedly. In my point of view, educational planners should devise some profitable plans to combination traditional and new methods of learning programs to increase students` efficiency and alacrity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 694, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communications'' or 'communication's'?
Suggestion: communications'; communication's
...tion and innovation can increase social communications vigor among students in university. In...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, furthermore, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00286532951 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41950397669 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518624641834 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8963665536 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 149.642857143 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120264881748 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522572561099 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484149339635 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876490383161 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215695845566 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.82 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.