Nowadays information is freely available on internet, therefore is no longer need for museum. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
The technology of dominated world with the prevalence of internet makes the world as a small village where we can know our past and present in just a click. Some argue that a museum is unnecessary place, while others believe in its undeniable merits and insist on to continue its existence. I strongly agree with latter view.
Although internet can creep ubiquitously into all areas of our life even the field of the past, museums make all the obtained historical information tangible. So, modern people’s day can perceive deeply the importance of their culture and art as well as appreciate how much their ancestry’s sacrificed to reach this sustenance and comfortable today’s life. In other words, internet cannot replace the treasure of the museum rather arouse people’s curiosity to push them to have a journey in such a place where can touch and contemplate of the history as saying “seeing is believing”.
In addition, internet can serve as a leveraged tool to guide people as well as children through their journey in the museum. By searching deeply on the internet when something get our interest and seeing and touching it makes our culture unforgettable. Moreover, children love the mysterious world and museums considered to be ambiguous place in their views. It can be the best teaching tool for kids to learn about their culture and art through the varied time-lined in just one place. This can insist on themselves to conserve their culture and makes our today’s work a beautiful history.
Overall, Internet and museum can be coexistence and complementary each another, however, internet cannot replace the merits of our gift museums.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23161764706 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9804342324 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566176470588 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0823627194 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.583333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0959372806294 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422386273032 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284901454038 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0677081573543 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148134472753 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.