Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
International tourism has been highlighted as an emerging, escaping broader public attention for its ramifications on different cultures. Although tensions ensuing could be possible, this pattern still norishes mutual understanding between people of different cultural backgrounds.
On the one hand, it is true that international tourism could result in cultural tensions. First, since some tourists from other nations have a penchant for ignoring or even insulting the customs, religious beliefs of the host nation, cultural clash could occur. For example, many individuals from western nations often show disrepect for historical sites with religious significance by vandalizing statues of higher deites, causing hatred and antagonism among locals. Second, some tourists are less likely to accommodate to the insitutions and social norms of the foreign nations, which could be associated with the cultural misunderstanding. In fact, many tourists are horified by the oppression against homosexuality and woman empowerment stemming from Islam interpretation in many Middle Estern nations, leading to the formation of false prejudices against Islam religiosity when it comes to the human rights abuses.
On the other hand, international tourism can be associated with the promotion of cultural understanding between different cultures. Specifically, tourists could have real deeper insights into the daily lives of the local citizens, which could eliminate the negative perspectives against that nation, leading to the betterment of cultural intermingling. For instance, if many Westerners visit Vietnam, they would realize that Vietnam is actual a stable nation with high economical development coinciding with the abundance of historical sites and cultural practices, clearing the false potrayals of Vietnam as a poverty-stricken nation with the communist oppression.
In conclusion, internation tourism could promote mutual understand between many peoples of cultural and ethnic backgrounds rather than inciting tensions and clashes. By being more aware of customs and social norms of the host nation, international tourism could be the optimal medium to bridge the gaps between different cultures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 780, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun Middle seems to be countable; consider using: 'many '.
Suggestion: many
...t stemming from Islam interpretation in many Middle Estern nations, leading to the formatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...nam is actual a stable nation with high economical development coinciding with the abundan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00316455696 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11105887275 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0709649775 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.083333333 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225314770586 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107186786141 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950279108702 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178438449388 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845118916336 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.82 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.