Nowadays, many charities and organizations have to publicize their activities by giving a name to a particular day, such as National Children's day for encouraging treatment of children, National Non-smoking Day for encouraging people to give up smoking. Why do these charities and organizations do so? How effective can these special days be?
Recent decades, many organizations have a penchant for naming a particular day to promote their activities, raising many questions about its implications. Given that there are a reason behind this trend, it could lead to some positive effects.
It should be acknowledged that this practice could raise other citizens’ awareness of the seriousness of the problems on a broader scale. In fact, by introducing National Children’s day, people could be informed about hardships or adversities children are suffering from, especially child exploitation or malnutrition. Similarly, Thanks to National non-smoking day, smokers get deeper insights into the detrimental impacts of cigarettes including higher risks of respiratory diseases stemming from the toxic chemicals.
It could be directly implied that this pattern could culminate in desirable benefits. First, it would encourage official authorities to undertake initiatives to combat the problems. For example, After the National Children’s day was issued, the legislation of child protection act was enacted by the Vietnamese government, putting more emphasis on children’s rights and liberty. In addition, this trend could motivate individuals to forgo harmful habits, thereby cultivating healthier lifestyles. For instance, By being conscious of smoking’s health costs on the national Non-smoking day, the smoker population has shrunken remarkably, suggesting a causal relationship with the decline in cases of lung cancers and other cardiovascular diseases.
In conclusion, this trend is exclusively for raising a higher degree of consciousness of the issues’ significance. Subsequently, it acts as a considerable contributor to the official authorities’ intervention and citizens’ attention to address the problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, similarly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.19367588933 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.56761792228 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664031620553 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4917485008 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.583333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313398952394 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978164994113 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918338435751 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176154913444 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060566618659 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.62 12.4159519038 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.48 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.