Nowadays, more and more people want to travel to remote areas such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this type of travel outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, there is an increasing number of people wanting to visit remote areas such as the South Pole. While this trend has some great benefits, I would argue that it could have some clear drawbacks to the tourists.
One the one hand, there are some advantages of travelling to isolated natural places. Firstly, since going to other cities or countries might be too common to some individuals, visiting to places such as the Sahara desert or the South Pole can bring more excitement to the travelers. This allows them to acquire valuable knowledge and gain unique experiences. Secondly, travelling to remote areas can help people, especially scientists and researchers, learn more about the natural habitat. For example, when going to Amazon rainforest, travelers have a chance to watch some types of plants and animals which can only live in this forest.
One the other hand, I strongly believe that this tendency has much more serious drawbacks. First, due to the poor conditions of the isolated natural areas, going to these places can be risky and dangerous for the tourists. For instance, the temperature in the South Pole is too low, which could negatively affect travelers’ heath. When visiting a rainforest, visitors might have to face a risk of being attacked by wild animals. Additionally, because travelling to remote areas need a large amount of money to ensure the safety, the costs of visiting these places are usually high. As a result, only researchers and rich people can afford this activity.
In conclusion, while travelling to isolated natural places can bring about some great benefits, I believe that the drawbacks of this trend are much more serious.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11594202899 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63808923424 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532608695652 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9585760696 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.857142857 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311710426446 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105547495608 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743502291626 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196420236459 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438677152114 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.