Nowadays, more and more people want to travel to remote areas such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this type of travel outweigh the disadvantages?
There is a great increase in the number of people are visiting distant places in the world such as South Pole. While this tendency has some drawbacks, I would argue that it has more benefits.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why travelling to far-away places brings serious problems. Firstly, due to hard weather and habitat conditions in remote sites, tourists travel to these places more easily get diseases such as fever and flu. This leads to the negative impacts on their health. Secondly, because it is more difficult to visit these dangerous places, citizens must spend more money on sports tools such as sweaters, boots, and gloves.
On the other hand, paying a visit to remote areas that brings more clear advantages. Firstly when having more people who are interested in adventurous trips, they could help to explore new areas that are wonderful and exotic. For instance, there are many strange caves and sites in the world travel magazines. If they do not go to these places, there might be no new areas that are explored until now. Secondly, people could have more valuable experiences in their lives, such as how to cook or keep warm in the forest or cold areas. Therefore, they might become more mature and confident. If they do not experience these times, they could not study those essential skills. Finally, when there is a significant rise in the number of new sites that are discovered, which leads to the development of the tourism industry. For instance, residents might spend more money on visiting these areas.
In conclusion, while traveling to deserted sites can have some disadvantages, I believe that its advantages are greater.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93950177936 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47462265768 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555160142349 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4754113715 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.75 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322861819158 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952855624876 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470344669288 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182562484246 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488449948974 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.