Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Over the last few years, the world had witnessed the advent of some young national leaders like the Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau or Emmanuel Macron, recent president-elect of France. Many people consider this trend as an enormous stride, meanwhile, others suppose that young people are unsuitable for playing a significant role in the political system. I would argue that the leading of young politicians should be welcomed with open arms.
On the one hand, I have strong belief that young politicians should be allocated in pivotal positions. First and foremost, youngsters are always energetic and open-minded. These optimistic personalities would significantly advantage the society since the universal community is craving for the individuals who are willing to adapt the rapidly changing world. Young ones would confidently conform to the novel concepts, consequently putting these ideas into practice without any hesitation. Additionally, young people are accessible to foreign knowledge and cultures, which will undoubtedly help them to build a strong background. For example, many Vietnamese young people who had the opportunity to expose the overseas life, contributing to the revolution of their country on a large scale.
On the other hand, it is better to a country's political system to limit the number of young politicians having the desire to sit in high positions. Although these people had been enabled to the international community and having an insight into politics, they are still insufficient due to the lack of training and experience. It is undeniable that the residents would vote for a conservative but serious and careful old politician rather than a reckless young person.
In conclusion, both the young politicians and the old ones have their own distinctive merits towards their community.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50176678445 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99132000213 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621908127208 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9272433547 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.769230769 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135413903758 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047695260551 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353977151206 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842453998699 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332216519027 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.