Nowadays, more people are migrating to other countries than ever before. In order to become integrated into society in their adopted countries, immigrants should abandon their old ways and adapt to local customs and codes of behavior.
Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, there is a dramatic increase of immigration. Despite the arguments of some people that new comers should change themselves to fit the local lifestyle and environment, it is my personal belief that immigrants can use their original culture to build their social circles. two of principal reasons for this are as follow.
For a start, cultural uniqueness is a possible way for people to meet new friends. Special eating habits or clothing styles, which are different to countries they moved to, can trigger locals curiousness. it seems can be a bridge between the two parties that have different living ways to generate a new topic to get closer. Neighbors can share their own food to each other for socialization and impressing others. Conspicuously, not to adapt to local customs and codes of behaviour can provide immigrants a path to fit in the society.
Secondly, keeping the old lifestyle is beneficial to the cultural diversity in that nation. Hong Kong, a place includes various kinds of culture, has become a tourist attraction as food paradise and shopping paradise. A country that contains a number of styles can attract tourist to experience it, which will result in a thriving tourism. With single culture, the nation will treat as a boring place that no one would like to travel to. Therefore, it is foreseeable that encouraging people to continue their lifestyle could be helpful to a nation's development.
By and large, I once again reaffirm me view that preserving immigrants' old ways is worthwhile. Not only do it help people to integrate into the new community, but it also facilitate the country’s development on tourism.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Two
... culture to build their social circles. two of principal reasons for this are as fo...
^^^
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
.... two of principal reasons for this are as follow. For a start, cultural uniqueness ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ved to, can trigger locals curiousness. it seems can be a bridge between the two p...
^^
Line 9, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ise. A country that contains a number of styles can attract tourist to experience...
^^
Line 9, column 543, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...e their lifestyle could be helpful to a nations development. By and large, I once...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 111, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
... old ways is worthwhile. Not only do it help people to integrate into the new commun...
^^^^
Line 13, column 172, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'facilitates'?
Suggestion: facilitates
...ate into the new community, but it also facilitate the country's development on touri...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90623496175 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625454545455 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6879251906 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205488870482 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585586046339 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505848658955 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121348839434 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361704861848 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.