Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. why do you think it is happening. Is it negative or positive development?

Today, technological innovations like robots have become an integral part of our lives. We use them to perform a variety of tasks both at home and work. In my opinion, this is a positive development and there are several social and economic reasons behind this.

First, our lifestyle has changed dramatically over the years. We have become super busy. We have demanding careers and a happening social life. We want to achieve as much as we can both on the professional front and in the personal space. Obviously, this requires time. Since we all have only twenty-four hours in a day, the need for time saving gadgets increases. Robots meet this demand perfectly. They can perform many mundane tasks faster and more efficiently than us. They can cook, clean and wash. Some robots can even babysit. Needless to say, they are invading our homes and offices and that is quite understandable. Take, for instance, the case of the cleaning robot ROMBA. More and more Americans are using it today it allows them to save a great deal of time which they can use to perform more rewarding tasks like studying, working or socializing.

The growing popularity of robots is generally a positive trend. Robots do not get tired or bored. They will happily perform the same task for hours on end. And unlike humans, they are less likely to make mistakes. While safety can still be an issue, the technology is developing fast and we will soon have a solution to safety concerns as well.

To conclude, the growing popularity of robots can be attributed to the fact that they allow us to save a lot of time. In my opinion, this is a positive trend that needs to be encouraged.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ng careers and a happening social life. We want to achieve as much as we can both ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, well, while, for instance, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72508591065 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57460108634 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570446735395 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5524198253 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 59.7826086957 106.682146367 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.652173913 20.7667163134 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91304347826 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166433771725 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446872076966 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617764452571 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115371221432 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344425977751 0.056905535591 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.0946893788 55% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 50.2224549098 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.27 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.