Nowadays, people have free access to music and videos online.
Is this a positive or a negative development?
In today’s world, watching movies and listening to songs helps the people to bring the change in their monotonous routine. Online access to these media files has made it easier, to a great extent, for people to download them free of cost. It is a negative development in my perception which is described further in detail.
Commencing with my viewpoint, one of the negative impacts of unlimited availability of media files is that people are getting addicted. It is not an uncommon thing to notice that most of the people like to spend every moment that they buy out of their busy schedules, staring at their cell-phone screens or their computers to explore their favourite video or audio content online. What they do not realize is that they waste a lot of their precious time doing such things and also feel restless when they do not get to do it. This not only meddles with their focusing power but also reduces their productive potential, both of which are essential to avoid procrastination of necessary tasks.
Moving further, another unacceptable aspect that is worth mentioning here is the level of piracy which has gained new heights recently. Undoubtedly, not all the content on the web is officially released by the makers of it. There are many individuals who find pleasure in distributing highly-paid content, freely to the public. This incurs a huge loss to the creators of that content who put a lot of energy, time and funds while creating their work as those who find it readily available never like to spend even a single penny to own it. Needless to say, this is also reducing the number of people going to the cinemas fading their popularity although gradually but consistently.
Conclusively, it can be said that free online access to music and videos has some pessimistic aspects associated with it. Therefore, there should be some limitations to its availability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 683, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty although gradually but consistently. Conclusively, it can be said that free o...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, therefore, while, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.946875 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75340520708 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596875 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.59163672 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.071428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167803745496 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542237560906 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549542134748 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104159030384 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454289582236 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.