Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what way has technology affected the types of relationships people Make Is this a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what way has technology affected the types of relationships people Make? Is this a positive or negative development?

Nowadays, technology is increasing day by day. Everyone has their own phone, laptop or computer. Due to these gadgets they can connect with each others. Technology changed the lifestyle of the people. This essay intends to highlight the positive as well as negative development.

To commence with, there are various positive development of technology. Firstly, with the help of technology people can communicate with their family members as well as friends. They can simply call or video call to their collegues. It is very helpful for those masses who are living far away from their parents as they do not feel homesickness. Secondly, technology make us life convienent. In today's era lot of social apps are available on internet. People are using these for connect with their near and dear one's. Also, individuals can use these apps for showing their status symbol to other. Moreover, people can use E - shopping while they sitting at home due to these they can save their money and time.

On the flip side, with the aid of technology people are using various apps due to these some people make fake ID's like on whatsapp, instagram, twitter and facebook and start chatting with anyone without knowing the person for the purpose of cheating. Furthermore, family bonding is also weaken due to these technology because masses using their phone everytime they do not spend free time with their parents. To add on, students distract from their studies as they playing online games

Hence, agglomerating above disscussed positive as well as negative development it can be stated that technology not only make us life convienent but crime rates are also witnessed as people use fake ID's for cheating purpose.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'weakened'.
Suggestion: weakened
...ng. Furthermore, family bonding is also weaken due to these technology because masses ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'these technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; these technologies
...e, family bonding is also weaken due to these technology because masses using their phone everyt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir studies as they playing online games Hence, agglomerating above disscussed po...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07092198582 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57259833307 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578014184397 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 72.092885107 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1176470588 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227887634467 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843182687899 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622913710474 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161817339853 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016695244818 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.