Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the type of relationships people make? Has this become positive or negative development?
The development of society leads to new technology innovation, therefore, the means of communication has changed day by day. Instead of using traditional ways to interact, modern technology makes a significant impact on people’s relationships in both positive and negative effects.
More than half of a century ago, the main way of interaction was meeting face to face, sometimes they had to leave messages because of an unpredictable/unscheduled plan or sending letters, which took more time for transportation. Recently, supported by upgraded devices, making an appointment has become easier by message or email notifications, as well as communicating indirectly by making a phone call. Moreover, apps on the internet platform such as google-meeting or zoom provide a place where people can hold a conference, especially during the social distancing period.
Modern means of interaction have gradually replaced the old traditional ones and the influence has proved clearly over decades. Not only saving time and money whenever sending letters, but also convenience and accurate, people can connect with whoever over the world. Besides, this development has increased the love and empathy among members of family or friends. However, unanticipated impacts have grown bigger and bigger among the youth when we recognize the sign of abusing social media. Adolescents tend to live a separate lifestyle without going out to see their friends or relatives because they have smart devices which provide whatever apps they want.
In conclusion, the development of high-tech interaction has replaced most conventional communication, which positively affects people and reveals some uncontrolled negative influence.
.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s some uncontrolled negative influence. .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73725490196 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34715938553 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678431372549 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8002564824 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277661036183 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903661201024 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930777338065 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172927203742 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989915905932 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.