Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, technology has largely affected the way people keep in touch with each other. Some people think that this is a disadvantage improvement. However, I believe technology helps people in a positive way to contact each other.
Firstly, in my opinion, technology has enabled people to stay in contact with each other more easily. People now can use the Internet and mobile phones or laptop to speak and send messages or information to each other. Moreover, this information can be in the form of pictures or videos. Thus, even if people are far from each other, they can feel close. In contrast, in the past, the drawback with communication systems was that it was very slow and took many time process such as send letters... Besides, this did not ensure safety and privacy.
Secondly, in the modern world, people often live, work or study in different cities or even different countries and they want to interact with those where their family members are. So, technology is a good way to helps people to maintain existing relationships.
Thirdly, technology has allowed people to become friends with others who strangers are in other countries and not be able to make friends with. In the past, people have no idea about languages or cultures from other countries. nevertheless, now, thanks to social networking websites, they can easily connect with those who come from other countries and know more knowledge about their cultures and languages as well.
In conclusion, I strongly think that technology has affected on relationships of different types in a positive way because it helps people to make friends and to keep up relationships more closely and easily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ever, I believe technology helps people in a positive way to contact each other. Firstly, in my ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...uages or cultures from other countries. nevertheless, now, thanks to social networking websi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ted on relationships of different types in a positive way because it helps people to make friends...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05054151625 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70174581763 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534296028881 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1018895314 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425841952108 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152380136927 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103949627591 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255054953134 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996948973744 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.