Nowadays we're producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can the government do to help reduce amount of rubbish?
These days people produce more wastage than ever before. In my opinion, the main reason for this development is excessive consumerism. Still, the situation might be improved, as long as the government steps in with a multifaceted approach: supporting green solutions and educating masses.
Firstly, growing consumerism, availability of products and increased advertising often lead to change in shopping habits. As a result, individuals tend to no longer buy only what they need, but also to purchase a lot of unnecessary items, especially food, what in turn generates waste on an unknown scale. According to the figures presented at the 2019 Biodiversity Conference in Manchester, 78% of all household rubbish is made of food wastage. In addition, most of the products are wrapped in plastic, which is not widely recyclable and commonly ends in the landfill, exacerbating the situation.
Irrespective of the reasons for the increased amount of generated rubbish, the government should take immediate action to tackle the issue. One way might be to support green incentives, which with some ingenuity would encouraging companies and ordinary citizens alike to reduce the amount of the waste. It has to be closely connected with environmental education. For example, since 2015 British primary schools curriculum includes subjects of recycling and reusing, and already shows a change in children's attitude towards household rubbish. This multifaceted approach of the government might be the leading change that is needed to reduce the wastage.
In conclusion, although the growing consumerism might lead to increased production of rubbish, there are ways for the government to help tackle the problem, namely by encouraging green incentives and educating children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'encourage'
Suggestion: encourage
...ntives, which with some ingenuity would encouraging companies and ordinary citizens alike t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...For example, since 2015 British primary schools curriculum includes subjects of recycli...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, still, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56666666667 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03886349776 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637037037037 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9018867664 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.615384615 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157214538926 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507150362976 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397370985173 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903803059323 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271086132912 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.